Partner review · 8 September 2026

Review decisions and sources

The decisions needed before the work is issued beyond the partners.

Working draft. Not an approved scheme, appointment or investment case.
Architect brief ↗Original model 01 ↗Expert model 02 ↗

Sense-check decisions before release

  1. Mix and objective: retain hotel/office as a test only, or prioritise operator-led and residential-income alternatives? Confirm minimum hotel scale and community commitments before briefing.
  2. Economics: replace the five most consequential assumptions first: hotel demand/operating margin, hotel build cost, office achievable rent, common infrastructure and planning lead time. Confirm the return hurdle and available equity.
  3. Scope and fees: reconcile the May quote, July diagnostic scope, architect Phase A scope and Akoma's remaining appointment. Confirm who has client authority and the amount available for initial studies.
  4. Review and release: Mo and partners check this pack and workbook; any consultant instruction or investment commitment requires its own authority. Mo authorised these working subpages to be public on 8 September 2026. Publishing the analysis does not authorise an appointment, spend or reliance on unverified assumptions.

Sources checked

Haarties repo: haarties-bible.md §§1–6, _status.md, finance/model-registry.md, reference/proposal.md; project-bibles channel context, global preferences and judgement corpus (no applicable tagged cross-project principle); Akoma wiki Stage 2 option screening and July 27 evidence pack. Live sources: DM Report 01 and July 27 RFP; Site Info SG3820/1998, SG3822/1998, SG3823/1998 and Zoning Info.pdf pp2–3; Gmail December 11 / May 8 / May 13 correspondence; Zubair's July 27 architect thread; scoped TickTick project. External cost/rent calibration: AECOM 2024/25 pp51,54,56 and Seeff CLS5705, checked September 8. Exact links and input-level limitations are in the workbook Sources tab.